<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Community: Bucciarelli, Louis</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/40282</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/40284" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <textInput>
    <title>The Community's search engine</title>
    <description>Search the Channel</description>
    <name>search</name>
    <link>http://dspace.mit.edu/simple-search</link>
  </textInput>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/40284">
    <title>Ethics and Engineering Education</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/40284</link>
    <description>Title: Ethics and Engineering Education
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Bucciarelli, Louis
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: ABET recommends the study of ethics so that students acquire “an understanding of professional and ethical&#xD;
responsibility”. For the most part, teaching of the subject relies upon the use of scenarios - both hypothetical&#xD;
and “real”- and open discussion framed by the codes. These scenarios and this framing strike me as seriously&#xD;
deficient - lacking in their attention to the complexities of context, almost solely focused on individual&#xD;
agency, while reflecting too narrow and simplistic a view of the responsibilities of the practicing engineer. A&#xD;
critique of several exemplary scenarios, and consideration of the demands placed upon today’s professional,&#xD;
prompt reflection on the need for, not just a more expansive reading of the codes of ethics re what it might&#xD;
mean to be “responsible”, but a substantial reform of undergraduate engineering education across the board.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Description: A presentation made at a Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering, Technical University of Delft, October 2007. &#xD;
&#xD;
A much shorter version of this paper has been submitted for consideration&#xD;
in the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION  2008 Société Européenne pour la Formation des&#xD;
Ingénieurs (SEFI); EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION</description>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

