<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Science, Technology, and Society (STS) - Archived</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34003</link>
<description>Science, Technology, and Society (STS)</description>
<item>
<title>STS.011 American Science: Ethical Conflicts and Political Choices, Fall 2004</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/49530</link>
<description>STS.011 American Science: Ethical Conflicts and Political Choices, Fall 2004

Gusterson, Hugh

Explores the changing roles, ethical conflicts, and public perceptions of science and scientists in American society from World War II to the present. Studies specific historical episodes focusing on debates between scientists and the contextual factors influencing their opinions and decisions. Topics include the atomic bomb project, environmental controversies, the Challenger disaster, biomedical research, genetic engineering, (mis)use of human subjects, scientific misconduct and whistleblowing.

</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>STS.436 Cold War Science, Spring 2004</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/49529</link>
<description>STS.436 Cold War Science, Spring 2004

Kaiser, David

This course examines the history and legacy of the Cold War on science, looking predominantly at examples in the United States. It begins by exploring scientists’ new political roles after World War II, ranging from elite policy-makers in the nuclear age to victims of domestic anti-Communism. The course next examines the changing institutions in which the physical, biological, and social sciences were conducted during the postwar decades, investigating the links between institutions and epistemology. The course closes by considering the place of science in the post-Cold-War era.

</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2004 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>STS.003 The Rise of Modern Science, Spring 2005</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45595</link>
<description>STS.003 The Rise of Modern Science, Spring 2005

Jones, David S. (David Shumway)

This course will study the development of modern science from the seventeenth century to the present, focusing on Europe and the United States. It will not focus on discoveries and their discoverers. Instead, it will examine: What is science? How has science been practiced, and by whom? How are discoveries made and accepted? What is the nature of scientific progress? What is the impact of science and society? What is the impact of society on science? Topics will be drawn from the histories of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, medicine, psychology, and computer science.

</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>STS.036 Industrial Landscapes, Fall 2004</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45559</link>
<description>STS.036 Industrial Landscapes, Fall 2004

Fitzgerald, Deborah Kay

Subject considers how the visual and material world of "nature" has been reshaped by industrial practices, beliefs, structures, and activities. Readings in historical geography, aesthetics, American history, environmental and ecological history, architecture, city planning, and landscape studies. Several field trips planned to visit local industrial landscapes. Assignments involve weekly short, written responses to the readings, and discussion-leading. Final project is a photo-essay on the student's choice of industrial site (photographic experience not necessary). Description from course home page: What makes a landscape industrial? What makes an industrial site a landscape? This class considers how the development of technology in America intersected with the natural world, in some cases reshaping its contours and meanings, and in other cases getting redefined by nature's largesse or diminished capacity. The dynamic relationship between these two forces offers many examples of "historical camouflage" in which places and things are not entirely what they seem to be. At this point in history, what things that we see are not industrial in some way? How can we learn the history of places, both obviously industrial like factories, and not so obviously, like supermarkets? Is there a pattern in urban and rural places regarding where things are located, such as railroad lines, houses, refineries? How do industrial patterns differ from non-industrial patterns? The goal of this class is to develop a richer appreciation for the ways in which nature has pushed back, resisted, and collaborated with technologies in America.

</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
