<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>CBCL Memos (1993 - 2004)</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5462</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:23:46 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2013-05-21T20:23:46Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Object Detection in Images by Components</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7293</link>
<description>Object Detection in Images by Components
Mohan, Anuj
In this paper we present a component based  person detection system that is capable of  detecting frontal, rear and near side views of  people, and partially occluded persons in  cluttered scenes. The framework that is  described here for people is easily applied to  other objects as well. The motivation for  developing a component based approach is  two fold: first, to enhance the performance of  person detection systems on frontal and rear  views of people and second, to develop a  framework that directly addresses the  problem of detecting people who are partially  occluded or whose body parts blend in with  the background. The data classification is  handled by several support vector machine  classifiers arranged in two layers. This  architecture is known as Adaptive  Combination of Classifiers (ACC). The  system performs very well and is capable of  detecting people even when all components  of a person are not found. The performance of  the system is significantly better than a full  body person detector designed along similar  lines. This suggests that the improved  performance is due to the components based  approach and the ACC data classification  structure.
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 1999 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7293</guid>
<dc:date>1999-08-11T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Note on Support Vector Machines Degeneracy</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7291</link>
<description>A Note on Support Vector Machines Degeneracy
Rifkin, Ryan; Pontil, Massimiliano; Verri, Alessandro
When training Support Vector Machines  (SVMs) over non-separable data sets, one  sets the threshold $b$ using any dual cost  coefficient that is strictly between the bounds  of $0$ and $C$. We show that there exist  SVM training problems with dual optimal  solutions with all coefficients at bounds, but  that all such problems are degenerate in the  sense that the "optimal separating  hyperplane" is given by ${f w} = {f 0}$, and the  resulting (degenerate) SVM will classify all  future points identically (to the class that  supplies more training data). We also derive  necessary and sufficient conditions on the  input data for this to occur. Finally, we show  that an SVM training problem can always be  made degenerate by the addition of a single  data point belonging to a certain  unboundedspolyhedron, which we  characterize in terms of its extreme points and  rays.
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 1999 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7291</guid>
<dc:date>1999-08-11T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Support Vector Machines: Training and Applications</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7290</link>
<description>Support Vector Machines: Training and Applications
Osuna, Edgar; Freund, Robert; Girosi, Federico
The Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a new  and very promising classification technique  developed by Vapnik and his group at AT&amp;T  Bell Labs. This new learning algorithm can be  seen as an alternative training technique for  Polynomial, Radial Basis Function and Multi-Layer Perceptron classifiers. An interesting  property of this approach is that it is an  approximate implementation of the Structural  Risk Minimization (SRM) induction principle.  The derivation of Support Vector Machines, its  relationship with SRM, and its geometrical  insight, are discussed in this paper. Training  a SVM is equivalent to solve a quadratic  programming problem with linear and box  constraints in a number of variables equal to  the number of data points. When the number  of data points exceeds few thousands the  problem is very challenging, because the  quadratic form is completely dense, so the  memory needed to store the problem grows  with the square of the number of data points.  Therefore, training problems arising in some  real applications with large data sets are  impossible to load into memory, and cannot  be solved using standard non-linear  constrained optimization algorithms. We  present a decomposition algorithm that can  be used to train SVM's over large data sets.  The main idea behind the decomposition is  the iterative solution of sub-problems and the  evaluation of, and also establish the stopping  criteria for the algorithm. We present previous  approaches, as well as results and important  details of our implementation of the algorithm  using a second-order variant of the Reduced  Gradient Method as the solver of the sub-problems. As an application of SVM's, we  present preliminary results we obtained  applying SVM to the problem of detecting  frontal human faces in real images.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 1997 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7290</guid>
<dc:date>1997-03-01T05:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>An Equivalence Between Sparse Approximation and Support Vector Machines</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7289</link>
<description>An Equivalence Between Sparse Approximation and Support Vector Machines
Girosi, Federico
In the first part of this paper we show a  similarity between the principle of Structural  Risk Minimization Principle (SRM) (Vapnik,  1982) and the idea of Sparse Approximation,  as defined in (Chen, Donoho and Saunders,  1995) and Olshausen and Field (1996). Then  we focus on two specific (approximate)  implementations of SRM and Sparse  Approximation, which have been used to solve  the problem of function approximation. For  SRM we consider the Support Vector Machine  technique proposed by V. Vapnik and his  team at AT&amp;T Bell Labs, and for Sparse  Approximation we consider a modification of  the Basis Pursuit De-Noising algorithm  proposed by Chen, Donoho and Saunders  (1995). We show that, under certain  conditions, these two techniques are  equivalent: they give the same solution and  they require the solution of the same  quadratic programming problem.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 1997 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7289</guid>
<dc:date>1997-05-01T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
