Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuongiorno, Jacopo
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-01T18:25:18Z
dc.date.available2016-11-01T18:25:18Z
dc.date.issued2013-08
dc.date.submitted2013-06
dc.identifier.issn03064549
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/105164
dc.description.abstractIt is well known that boiling and quenching heat transfer depends strongly on the morphology and composition of the solid surface through which the heat transfer occurs. The relevant surface features are roughness, wettability (hydrophilicity), porosity, presence of cavities, size and shape of cavities, and thermo-physical properties of the surface material. Recent work at MIT has explored the separate effects of surface roughness, wettability and porosity on both Critical Heat Flux (CHF) and quenching heat transfer (Leidenfrost point temperature). Briefly, interconnected porosity within a hydrophilic matrix greatly enhances the CHF (by as much as ∼60%) and the Leidenfrost temperature (by as much as ∼150 °C). Surprisingly, surface roughness has a comparably minor effect on both CHF and quenching. There are opportunities to exploit in Light Water Reactor (LWR) nuclear plants, where CHF and quenching determine the thermal margins in during loss-of-flow and loss-of-coolant accidents, respectively, and the surface of the fuel naturally develops porous hydrophilic layers because of CRUD deposition and corrosion. This paper reviews the MIT experimental database generated using engineered surfaces with carefully-controlled characteristics, and discuss its applications to LWR safety, both design-basis and beyond-design-basis accidents.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAREVA NPen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.07.019en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Buongiorno via Chris Sherratten_US
dc.titleCan corrosion and CRUD actually improve safety margins in LWRs?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBuongiorno, Jacopo. "Can corrosion and CRUD actually improve safety margins in LWRs?." Annals of Nuclear Energy 63 (January 2014), pp.9-21.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.approverBuongiorno, Jacopoen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorBuongiorno, Jacopo
dc.relation.journalAnnals of Nuclear Energyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsBuongiorno, Jacopoen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record