Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHandsteiner, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorRauch, Dominik
dc.contributor.authorGallicchio, Jason
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Bo
dc.contributor.authorHosp, Hannes
dc.contributor.authorKofler, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorBricher, David
dc.contributor.authorFink, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Calvin
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Hien T.
dc.contributor.authorSteinlechner, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorUrsin, Rupert
dc.contributor.authorWengerowsky, Sören
dc.contributor.authorScheidl, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorZeilinger, Anton
dc.contributor.authorFriedman, Andrew Samuel
dc.contributor.authorMark, Anthony M.
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Isabella T.
dc.contributor.authorGuth, Alan
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, David I.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-06T15:25:09Z
dc.date.available2017-03-06T15:25:09Z
dc.date.issued2017-02
dc.date.submitted2017-01
dc.identifier.issn0031-9007
dc.identifier.issn1079-7114
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107186
dc.description.abstractBell’s theorem states that some predictions of quantum mechanics cannot be reproduced by a local-realist theory. That conflict is expressed by Bell’s inequality, which is usually derived under the assumption that there are no statistical correlations between the choices of measurement settings and anything else that can causally affect the measurement outcomes. In previous experiments, this “freedom of choice” was addressed by ensuring that selection of measurement settings via conventional “quantum random number generators” was spacelike separated from the entangled particle creation. This, however, left open the possibility that an unknown cause affected both the setting choices and measurement outcomes as recently as mere microseconds before each experimental trial. Here we report on a new experimental test of Bell’s inequality that, for the first time, uses distant astronomical sources as “cosmic setting generators.” In our tests with polarization-entangled photons, measurement settings were chosen using real-time observations of Milky Way stars while simultaneously ensuring locality. Assuming fair sampling for all detected photons, and that each stellar photon’s color was set at emission, we observe statistically significant ≳7.31σ and ≳11.93σ violations of Bell’s inequality with estimated p values of ≲1.8×10[superscript -13] and ≲4.0×10[superscript -33], respectively, thereby pushing back by ∼600  years the most recent time by which any local-realist influences could have engineered the observed Bell violation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAustrian Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAustrian Science Fund (Projects SFB F40 (FOQUS) and CoQuS W1210-N16)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAustria. Federal Ministry of Science, Research, and Economyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (INSPIRE Grant PHY-1541160 and SES-1056580)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Undergraduate Research Opportunities Programen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Physical Societyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.060401en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0en_US
dc.sourceAmerican Physical Societyen_US
dc.titleCosmic Bell Test: Measurement Settings from Milky Way Starsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHandsteiner, Johannes et al. “Cosmic Bell Test: Measurement Settings from Milky Way Stars.” Physical Review Letters 118.6 (2017): n. pag. © 2017 American Physical Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physicsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Societyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFriedman, Andrew Samuel
dc.contributor.mitauthorMark, Anthony M.
dc.contributor.mitauthorSanders, Isabella T.
dc.contributor.mitauthorGuth, Alan
dc.contributor.mitauthorKaiser, David I.
dc.relation.journalPhysical Review Lettersen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2017-02-14T18:31:01Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderauthors
dspace.orderedauthorsHandsteiner, Johannes; Friedman, Andrew S.; Rauch, Dominik; Gallicchio, Jason; Liu, Bo; Hosp, Hannes; Kofler, Johannes; Bricher, David; Fink, Matthias; Leung, Calvin; Mark, Anthony; Nguyen, Hien T.; Sanders, Isabella; Steinlechner, Fabian; Ursin, Rupert; Wengerowsky, Sören; Guth, Alan H.; Kaiser, David I.; Scheidl, Thomas; Zeilinger, Antonen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-5206
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-6744
dspace.mitauthor.errortrue
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record