Bending the Pipeline? Executive Search and Gender Inequality in Hiring for Top Management Jobs
Author(s)
Fernandez-Mateo, Isabel; Fernandez, Roberto M
DownloadExecutive-search-Roberto-Feranandez.pdf (1.934Mb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We study the sources of women’s underrepresentation in hiring for top management jobs by focusing on the context of executive search. Using data that include proprietary information on 10,970 individuals considered by a search firm, we examine the sources of the low proportion of women placed in senior roles. Contrary to received wisdom, we find limited evidence that demand-side screeners strongly contribute to gender disadvantage in this setting. What gender differences exist tend to play out at the start of the hiring process and are driven both by supply-side and demand-side actors. Once considered for a position, women are no less likely than men to be hired—though they are slightly less likely to be interviewed by the search firm. Our findings highlight the theoretical importance of disentangling candidates’ “self-steering” behavior from the “pipeline bending” of hiring agents. We discuss the implications of our results for understanding gender inequality at upper echelons of the labor market.
Date issued
2016-02Department
Sloan School of ManagementJournal
Management Science
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Citation
Fernandez-Mateo, Isabel, and Fernandez, Roberto M. “Bending the Pipeline? Executive Search and Gender Inequality in Hiring for Top Management Jobs.” Management Science 62, 12 (December 2016): 3636–3655 © 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
0025-1909
1526-5501