Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAcocella, Angela J. (Angela Josephine)
dc.contributor.authorCaplice, Chris
dc.contributor.authorSheffi, Yossi
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T14:20:28Z
dc.date.available2020-02-05T14:20:28Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123694
dc.descriptionA later version of this working paper has been published in a peer-reviewed journal and can be access here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102073
dc.description.abstractDynamic macroeconomic conditions and non-binding truckload freight contracts enable both shippers and carriers to behave opportunistically. We present an empirical analysis of carrier reciprocity in the US truckload transportation sector to demonstrate whether consistent performance and fair pricing by shippers when markets are in their favor result in maintained primary carrier tender acceptance when markets turn. The results suggest carriers have short memories: they do not remember shippers’ previous period pricing or tendering consistency when making freight acceptance decisions. However, carriers appear to be myopic and respond to shippers’ current market period behaviors, ostensibly without regard to shippers’ previous behaviors.en_US
dc.publisherMIT Center for Transportation & Logisticsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT Global Supply Chain and Logistics Excellence Network Working Paper Series; 2020-mitscale-ctl-01
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102073
dc.titleElephants or Goldfish?: An Empirical Analysis of Carrier Reciprocity in Dynamic Freight Marketsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Transportation & Logisticsen_US
dspace.date.submission2020-01-23T15:43:11Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record