Advanced Search
DSpace@MIT

Committee Jurisdiction and Internet Intellectual Property Protection

Research and Teaching Output of the MIT Community

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author deFigueiredo, John
dc.date.accessioned 2002-07-22T15:45:24Z
dc.date.available 2002-07-22T15:45:24Z
dc.date.issued 2002-07-22T15:45:24Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1487
dc.description.abstract This paper examines the impact of increasingly common congressional committee jurisdictional turf wars on policy outcomes. It develops a theoretical model that shows how legislators balance the benefits of expanded committee jurisdiction against preferred policy outcomes, yielding predictions that are different from the traditional committee-dominance theories. The theory predicts that a) senior members, and members who are in safe districts are most likely to challenge another committee's jurisdiction; b) policy proposals may be initiated off the proposer's ideal point in order to obtain jurisdiction over an issue; c) in many cases, policy outcomes will be more moderate with jurisdictional fights than they would be without these turf wars. The paper tests the implications of the theory examining proposed Internet intellectual property protection legislation to reform electronic database law in the 106th Congress. en
dc.description.sponsorship E-Business Center at MIT en
dc.format.extent 322483 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.subject committee dominance en
dc.subject policy outcomes en
dc.subject 106th Congress en
dc.subject intellectual property en
dc.subject Internet protection en
dc.title Committee Jurisdiction and Internet Intellectual Property Protection en


Files in this item

Name Size Format Description
defigueiredo_0502.pdf 314.9Kb PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

MIT-Mirage