Advanced Search
DSpace@MIT

Best Effort versus Spectrum Markets: Wideband and Wi-Fi versus 3G MVNOs?

Research and Teaching Output of the MIT Community

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author McKnight, Lee
dc.contributor.author Linsenmayer, Raymond
dc.contributor.author Lehr, William
dc.date.accessioned 2002-07-22T16:00:46Z
dc.date.available 2002-07-22T16:00:46Z
dc.date.issued 2001-10-28
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1491
dc.description.abstract This paper asks is whether (i) 3rd generation wireless services, as embodied in the planned and soon to be offered services emerging first in Asia and Europe, or (ii) the unlicensed wireless services such as 802.11 or wi-fi but also including more advanced wideband and ultrawideband (UWB) services which are being experimented with primarily in North America, offer more compelling visions for advanced wireless services. we conclude that secondary spectrum markets are important for the viability of the 3G industry, and not only for reasons of efficiency. One large difference between 2G and 3G networks, observed in our models, was that voice services alone would not generate sufficient revenues for a 3G system. License holders which up to now have concentrated on selling a single product, will need to develop a much larger range of advanced applications, which will have to be marketed and packaged in different ways for different market segments. en
dc.format.extent 64971 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.subject wideband en
dc.subject license holders en
dc.subject 3rd generation en
dc.subject wireless services en
dc.subject spectrum markets en
dc.subject ultrawideband en
dc.title Best Effort versus Spectrum Markets: Wideband and Wi-Fi versus 3G MVNOs? en


Files in this item

Name Size Format Description
best_effort_v_spe ... 63.44Kb PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

MIT-Mirage