Advanced Search
DSpace@MIT

The Crisis in the U.S. and International Cancer Policy

Research and Teaching Output of the MIT Community

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Epstein, Samuel
dc.contributor.author Ashford, Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned 2007-08-22T15:09:19Z
dc.date.available 2007-08-22T15:09:19Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/38480
dc.description.abstract The incidence of cancer in the United States and other major industrialized nations has escalated to epidemic proportions over recent decades, and greater increases are expected. While smoking is the single largest cause of cancer, the incidence of childhood cancers and a wide range of predominantly nonsmoking- related cancers in men and women has increased greatly. This modern epidemic does not reflect lack of resources of the U.S. cancer establishment, the National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society; the NCI budget has increased 20-fold since passage of the 1971 National Cancer Act, while funding for research and public information on primary prevention remains minimal. The cancer establishment bears major responsibility for the cancer epidemic, due to its overwhelming fixation on damage control—screening, diagnosis, treatment, and related molecular research— and indifference to preventing a wide range of avoidable causes of cancer, other than faulty lifestyle, particularly smoking. This mindset is based on a discredited 1981 report by a prominent pro-industry epidemiologist, guesstimating that environmental and occupational exposures were responsible for only 5 percent of cancer mortality, even though a prior chemical industry report admitted that 20 percent was occupational in origin. This report still dominates public policy, despite overwhelming contrary scientific evidence on avoidable causes of cancer from involuntary exposures to a wide range of environmental carcinogens. Since 1998, the ACS has been planning to gain control of national cancer policy, now under federal authority. These plans, developed behind closed doors and under conditions of nontransparency, with recent well-intentioned but mistaken bipartisan Congressional support, pose a major and poorly reversible threat to cancer prevention and to winning the losing war against cancer. en
dc.subject cancer en
dc.subject policy en
dc.subject United States en
dc.subject international en
dc.title The Crisis in the U.S. and International Cancer Policy en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.citation Internationa Journal of Health Services en


Files in this item

Name Size Format Description
Epstein_Ashford_C ... 150.2Kb PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Technology and Law Program
    Research and graduate studies bring law and technology perspectives to environmental, policy, trade, and sustainability issues

Show simple item record

MIT-Mirage