|
DSpace at MIT >
MIT Libraries >
MIT Theses >
Theses - Science, Technology, and Society >
Science, Technology and Society - Ph.D. / Sc.D. >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39578
|
| Title: | Those who don't know : modernity, risk, and transition in Hanoi's local markets |
| Authors: | Hiesinger, Margaret Amalia |
| Advisor: | Deborah Fitzgerald. |
| Department: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society. |
| Other contributors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society. |
| Keywords: | Program in Science, Technology and Society. |
| Issue Date: | 2007 |
| Publisher: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| Abstract: | My research is about the particular effects of Vietnam's economic liberalization program (known as "doi moi") on the local food and market system in Hanoi. Doi moi policies, which began in the late 1980s, have instituted major changes in both the national system of agricultural production and in Hanoi's local system of marketplaces. The doi moi reforms have created many new opportunities in Hanoi, but they have also re-configured social relationships and market spaces along the food chain to present new kinds of risk for consumers. These include harmful chemicals, goods of uncertain quality, and sellers who operate outside of the moral obligations of the dominant system of personal relationships. These things have not yet been resolved through regulation and have therefore been left to consumers and sellers to work out among themselves. The competition between various actors to manage foodborne risk in the absence of state regulation has taken place amidst the state's campaign to re-order Hanoi's market system according to neoiberal ideals.
(cont.) This has made the local market system a site for the enactment of a symbolic politics of modernity in which discourses that are really about risk and political economy have been obscured by their expression as a debate about "tradition" and modernity." Beneath the discourse of modernization lies a range of hybrid market worlds as well as systemic issues related to the transition from a centrally planned economy to a free market system. |
| Description: | Thesis (Ph. D. in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society (HASTS))--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Science, Technology and Society, June 2007.
"May 2007."
Includes bibliographical references (p. 284-308). |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39578 |
| Appears in Collections: | Science, Technology and Society - Ph.D. / Sc.D.
Science, Technology & Society - Ph.D. / Sc.D.
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format |
|---|
| 174289708.pdf | Preview, non-printable (open to all) | 23358Kb | Adobe PDF | View/Open | | 174289708-MIT.pdf | Full printable version (MIT only) | 23358Kb | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
|
|  |
This item is protected by original copyright
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|
