Login

On dictatorships

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Daron Acemoglu and James M. Snyder, Jr. en_US
dc.contributor.author Debs, Alexandre en_US
dc.contributor.other Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-12-07T16:12:58Z
dc.date.available 2007-12-07T16:12:58Z
dc.date.issued 2007 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39723
dc.description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2007. en_US
dc.description "June 2007." en_US
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (p. 101-107). en_US
dc.description.abstract This dissertation consists of three essays on dictatorships. The first two study the economic impact of power struggles in dictatorships. They focus on one mechanism used by dictators to remain in power, shuffling, where delegates have a short and uncertain tenure in any assignment. In these models, there is a ruler, a delegate and a population. The ruler and the delegate have a 'type', characterizing their ability as a ruler. The population can mount an insurrection, replacing the ruler with the delegate. The type of the ruler is known, while the type of the delegate is unknown to the other players. In Chapter 1, I assume that the delegate does not know his type, but can reveal it through an investment decision. I then show that shuffling is useful politically, even though it produces an economic cost, in that it reduces the delegate's incentive to invest, which prevents information about his type from being revealed. I also show that the ability to shuffle has some economic benefits, in that it assures the ruler that he can eliminate growing political threats, which induces him to encourage some investment. en_US
dc.description.abstract (cont.) In Chapter 2, I assume that the delegate knows his type and can call for an insurrection. I show that shuffling can ensure the ruler's survival when it is a punishment on the delegate. With sufficiently low payoffs, even a bad type wants to replace the ruler, so that no call for insurrection can be trusted. The same logic explains why a ruler would invest in a white elephant project to remain in power. In Chapter 3, I propose a general model of divide and rule. I show that a ruler maximizes rents by playing off divisions in the population. Typically, a ruler relies on an extreme support base, who is most afraid of the alternative regime, and invests in any technology which exacerbates popular divisions. I argue that the model offers an explanation for the negative correlation between corruption and freedom of the media, which has been widely documented. This explanation is consistent with widespread awareness of corruption in the population. en_US
dc.description.provenance Made available in DSpace on 2007-12-07T16:12:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 180703826.pdf: 5660013 bytes, checksum: 21c48b81b0fc82e7456045f18070b76d (MD5) 180703826-MIT.pdf: 5659820 bytes, checksum: c7fbc67ebb9d881cfc492672819260be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 en
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Alexandre Debs. en_US
dc.format.extent 107 p. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology en_US
dc.rights M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. en_US
dc.rights.uri http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subject Economics. en_US
dc.title On dictatorships en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.degree Ph.D. en_US
dc.contributor.department Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics. en_US
dc.identifier.oclc 180703826 en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format
Preview, non-printable (open to all) 5.660Mb application/pdf
Full printable version (MIT only) 5.659Mb application/pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace@MIT


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Links