Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiski, Mattien_US
dc.contributor.authorMontero, Juan-Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-03T17:06:10Z
dc.date.available2009-04-03T17:06:10Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier2004-012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45020
dc.description.abstractWe consider an infinitely-repeated oligopoly in which at each period firms not only serve the spot market by either competing in prices or quantities but also have the opportunity to trade forward contracts. Contrary to the pro-competitive results of finite-horizon models, we find that the possibility of forward trading allows firms to sustain collusive profits that otherwise would not be possible. The result holds both for price and quantity competition and follows because (collusive) contracting of future sales is more effective in deterring deviations from the collusive plan than in inducing the previously identified pro-competitive effects.en_US
dc.format.extent16 pen_US
dc.publisherMIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-CEEPR (Series) ; 04-012WP.en_US
dc.titleForward trading and collusion in oligopolyen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.oclc56572295en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record