Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBailey, Elizabeth M.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-03T17:08:06Z
dc.date.available2009-04-03T17:08:06Z
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier98005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45079
dc.description.abstractThe U.S. Acid Rain Program is one of the first, and by far the most extensive, applications of a market based approach to pollution control. From the beginning, there has been concern whether utilities would participate in allowance trading, and whether regulatory activity at the state level would further complicate utilities' decision to trade allowances. This paper finds that public utility commission regulation has encouraged allowance trading activity in states with regulatory rulings, but that allowance trading activity has not been limited to states issuing regulations. Until there is evidence suggesting that significant additional cost savings could have been obtained if additional allowance trading activity had occurred in states without regulations or that utilities in states with regulations are still not taking advantage of all cost saving trading opportunities, this analysis suggests that there is little reason to believe that allowance trading activity is impeded by public utility commission regulations.en_US
dc.format.extent38 pen_US
dc.publisherMIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-CEEPR (Series) ; 98-005WP.en_US
dc.titleAllowance trading activity and state regulatory rulings : evidence from the U.S. Acid Rain Programen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.oclc39305344en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record