Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMargolis, Robert M.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-15T23:59:50Z
dc.date.available2009-12-15T23:59:50Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier92011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50203
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses how two sets of emissions scenarios, generated using the Atmospheric Stabilization Framework, were used by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In particular it discusses how the scenarios were specified, what roles models played in developing the scenarios, and how the scenarios were interpreted by participants in the IPCC process. It draws on the results of interviews conducted with 14 participants in the IPCC process. After looking at how both sets of IPCC emissions scenarios were defined and interpreted it is clear that analysts need to explore the effects of policies in the context of uncertainty. Thus, instead of testing policy options on a single future and/or generating a range of possible futures in the absence of policy intervention, analysts need to investigate the effectiveness of various policy options across an entire set of possible futures. Conducting this sort of analysis would be an important step beyond the IPCC emissions scenarios.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by the MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, and the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.en_US
dc.format.extent27 pen_US
dc.publisherMIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-CEEPR (Series) ; 92-011WP.en_US
dc.titleInterpreting the IPCC emisions scenariosen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.oclc35719947en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record