Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEllerman, A. Dennyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMontero, Juan-Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-16T00:01:07Z
dc.date.available2009-12-16T00:01:07Z
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier96001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50214
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an analysis of the reduction in SO2 emissions by electric utilities between 1985 and 1993. We find that emissions have been reduced for reasons largely unrelated to the emission reduction mandate incorporated in Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. The principal reason appears to be the change in the economics of coal choice that has resulted from the remarkable decline in rail rates for low sulfur western coal delivered to higher sulfur coal-fired plants in the Midwest. We conclude that allowance prices are lower than expected because less sulfur must be removed to meet the Title IV caps on aggregate SO2 emissions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by a grant from the National Acidic Precipitation Assessment Program of the US Government, and the Catholic University of Chile.en_US
dc.format.extent17 p., [10] p. of platesen_US
dc.publisherMIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-CEEPR (Series) ; 96-001WP.en_US
dc.titleWhy are allowance prices so low? : an analysis of the SO2 emissions trading programen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.oclc35721182en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record