Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHogg, Michael A.
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-17T16:38:25Z
dc.date.available2010-06-17T16:38:25Z
dc.date.issued2005-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/55932
dc.description.abstractThe title of this paper suggests a paradox. Leaders are simultaneously separate from and the same as their followers. They have higher status, greater influence, and more power, and occupy a different role, but they are also members of and identify with the same group as their followers. George W. Bush, as president, is certainly quite separate from most Americans, but he identifies himself as an American, and he spends a great deal of time making sure all Americans know this. However, if we take a fairly common type of definition of leadership as “a process of social influence through which an individual enlists and mobilizes the aid of others in the attainment of a collective goal” (Chemers, 2001, 376), then we can see that Bush is only really a leader to those who will follow—those who share his definition of American and therefore those who share his identity, group membership, and collective goal.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCenter for Public Leadershipen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCenter for Public Leadership Working Paper Series;05-01
dc.rightsAttribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/en
dc.subjecthksen_US
dc.subjectcplen_US
dc.subjectkennedy schoolen_US
dc.subjectleadershipen_US
dc.subjectsocial identityen_US
dc.titleOne of Us: Social Identity, Group Belonging and Leadershipen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record