Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLorlene Hoyt.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMackres, Eric Benjaminen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-maen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-29T13:55:16Z
dc.date.available2010-10-29T13:55:16Z
dc.date.copyright2010en_US
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59577
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2010.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 80-81).en_US
dc.description.abstractSome social movement organizations have begun to use collaborative methods to create decentralized network power for shared action through long-term alliance development and participation in collaborative public decision-making forums. Through the history of Community Labor United (CLU), a Boston-based long-term community-labor alliance, I establish the existence of mutual benefits between organizing and collaborative methods for creating solutions to complex problems. The prerequisites for the application of collaborative methods--diversity of interests, interdependence of interests, and authentic dialogue (DIAD)--are used to describe CLU's application of collaborative methods to the development of their alliance and their participation in statewide energy efficiency planning and implementation. I conclude by providing recommendations for the co-application of social movement organizing and collaborative planning practices to energy efficiency planning and complex public policy issues more generally.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Eric Mackres.en_US
dc.format.extent81 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleCollaborative methods in social movement organizing : a case study of long-term alliance development and energy efficiency planning in Massachusettsen_US
dc.title.alternativeCase study of long-term alliance development and energy efficiency planning in Massachusettsen_US
dc.title.alternativeLong-term alliance development and energy efficiency planning in Massachusettsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc670433161en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record