Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan Acker, Janen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratoryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-06T22:22:58Z
dc.date.available2012-01-06T22:22:58Z
dc.date.issued1991en_US
dc.identifier24101868en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68093
dc.descriptionMay 1991en_US
dc.descriptionAlso issued as an M.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and Sloan School of Management, 1991en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 131-132)en_US
dc.description.abstractThe thesis examined the effects on competition of deregulation in the airline industry by analyzing changes in concentration over the ten-year period 1979-1989 in two sets of origin-destination city-pair markets: the top 100 markets in which the most passengers traveled in 1989, and the top ten markets to and from each of fifteen dominated cities. Concentration levels were significantly lower in the top 100 markets in 1979 than in 1989. Average concentration levels in the 150 markets out of the dominated cities were only slightly lower in 1989 than in. 1979. In both sets of markets average concentration decreased from 1979 to 1985. From 1985 to 1989, it increased slightly in the top 100 markets, and it increased significantly in the 150 markets out of the dominated cities. The hub-and-spoke route structure developed by all major airlines was the primary cause for the decrease in concentration levels in most of the markets. In the markets out of the hub airports, the development of the hub by a single airline led to an increase in competition in the period 1979-1985, as this airline began to compete against incumbent carriers in those markets. After 1985, however, the hub airlines became gradually dominant in the markets out of their hub airports, prompting many to ask for re-regulation of some kind. This would probably not increase competition in the dominated cities' markets, however, and would very likely adversely affect competition in the overall air transportation system.en_US
dc.format.extent139 pen_US
dc.publisherCambridge, Mass. : Flight Transportation Laboratory, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, [1991]en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFTL report (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory) ; R91-2en_US
dc.subjectAirlinesen_US
dc.subjectAeronautics, Commercialen_US
dc.subjectDeregulationen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_US
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_US
dc.titleConcentration in U.S. air transportation : an analysis of origin-destination markets since deregulationen_US
dc.title.alternativeConcentration in US air transportation : an analysis of origin-destination markets since deregulation an analysis of origin-destination markets since deregulationen_US
dc.title.alternativeConcentration in United States air transportation : an analysis of origin-destination markets since deregulation an analysis of origin-destination markets since deregulationen_US
dc.title.alternativeAnalysis of origin-destination markets since deregulation an analysis of origin-destination markets since deregulation an analysis of origin-destination markets since deregulationen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record