Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPindyck, Robert S.
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-06T21:01:31Z
dc.date.available2012-08-06T21:01:31Z
dc.date.issued2012-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72003
dc.description.abstractI examine the risk/return tradeoff for environmental investments, and its implications for policy choice. Consider a policy to reduce carbon emissions. To what extent does the value of such a policy depend on the expected future damages from global warming versus uncertainty over those damages, i.e., on the expected benefits from the policy versus their riskiness? And to what extent should the policy objective be a reduction in the expected temperature increase versus a reduction in risk? Using a simple model of a stock externality (e.g., temperature) that evolves stochastically, I examine the “willingness to pay” (WTP) for alternative policies that would reduce the expected damages under “business as usual” (BAU) versus the variance of those damages. I also show how one can compute “iso-WTP” curves (social indifference curves) for combinations of risk and expected returns as policy objectives. Given cost estimates for reducing risk and increasing expected returns, one can compute the optimal risk-return mix for a policy, and the policy’s social surplus. I illustrate these results by calibrating the model to data for global warming.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMIT CEEPRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCEEPR Working Papers;2012-010
dc.rightsAn error occurred on the license name.en
dc.rights.uriAn error occurred getting the license - uri.en
dc.titleRisk and Return in Environmental Economicsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.citationCEEPR-WP-2012-010en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record