MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Department of Economics
  • MIT Dept. of Economics Working Papers Series
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Department of Economics
  • MIT Dept. of Economics Working Papers Series
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation

Author(s)
Banerjee, Abhijit; Duflo, Esther; Glennester, Rachel; Kinnan, Cynthia
Thumbnail
DownloadWorking paper (745.3Kb)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This paper reports on the first randomized evaluation of the impact of introducing the standard microcredit group-based lending product in a new market. In 2005, half of 104 slums in Hyderabad, India were randomly selected for opening of a branch of a particular microfinance institution (Spandana) while the remainder were not, although other MFIs were free to enter those slums. Fifteen to 18 months after Spandana began lending in treated areas, households were 8.8 percentage points more likely to have a microcredit loan. They were no more likely to start any new business, although they were more likely to start several at once, and they invested more in their existing businesses. There was no effect on average monthly expenditure per capita. Expenditure on durable goods increased in treated areas, while expenditures on “temptation goods” declined. Three to four years after the initial expansion (after many of the control slums had started getting credit from Spandana and other MFIs ), the probability of borrowing from an MFI in treatment and comparison slums was the same, but on average households in treatment slums had been borrowing for longer and in larger amounts. Consumption was still no different in treatment areas, and the average business was still no more profitable, although we find an increase in profits at the top end. We found no changes in any of the development outcomes that are often believed to be affected by microfinance, including health, education, and women’s empowerment. The results of this study are largely consistent with those of four other evaluations of similar programs in different contexts.
Date issued
2013-06-06
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/79070
Series/Report no.
MIT Department of Economics Working Paper Series;13-09

Collections
  • MIT Dept. of Economics Working Papers Series

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.