Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBartolomei, Jason E.
dc.contributor.authorHastings, Daniel E.
dc.contributor.authorde Neufville, Richard
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Donna H.
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-27T14:18:55Z
dc.date.available2014-01-27T14:18:55Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84540
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this research is to develop an analytical framework for screening for real options “in” an engineering system. Real options is defined in the finance literature as the right, but not the obligation, to take an action (e.g. deferring, expanding, contracting, or abandoning) at a predetermined cost and for a predetermined time. These are called "real options" because they pertain to physical or tangible assets, such as equipment, rather than financial instruments. Real options improve a system’s capability of undergoing classes of changes with relative ease. This property is often called “flexibility.” Recently, the DoD has emphasized the need to develop flexible system in order to improve operational, technical, and programmatic effectiveness. The aim of this research is to apply real options thinking to weapon acquisitions in order to promote the ability of weapon system programs to deftly avoid downside consequences or exploit upside opportunities.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectreal optionsen_US
dc.subjectengineering systemen_US
dc.subjectweapon acquisitionsen_US
dc.titleScreening for Real Options “In” an Engineering System: A Step Towards Flexible System Developmenten_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record