Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, R. Michael
dc.contributor.authorGoodrich, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorHall, Thad E.
dc.contributor.authorKiewiet, D. Roderick
dc.contributor.authorSled, Sarah M.
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-14T16:53:41Z
dc.date.available2015-04-14T16:53:41Z
dc.date.issued2003-11-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96546
dc.description.abstractThe October 7, 2003 California Recall Election strained California’s direct democracy. In recent California politics there has not been a statewide election conducted on such short notice; county election officials were informed on July 24 that the election would be held on October 7. Nor has California recently seen a ballot with so many candidates running for a single statewide office. With easy ballot access requirements, Secretary of State Kevin Shelley certified 135 candidates for the official ballot on August 13.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCarnegie Corporation of New Yorken_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCaltech/MIT Voting Technology Projecten_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVTP Working Paper Series;9
dc.subject2003 California recall electionen_US
dc.subjectPolling place problemsen_US
dc.subjectBallot translation vertical proximity effecten_US
dc.subjectBallot designen_US
dc.subjectSurvey dataen_US
dc.titleThe Complexity of the California Recall Electionen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record