Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Ambient Formaldehyde over the United States from Ground-Based (AQS) and Satellite (OMI) Observations

Ambient Formaldehyde over the United States from Ground-Based (AQS) and Satellite (OMI) Observations

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

remotesensing-14-02191-v2.pdf

Size

2.08 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

0e02e17f3419765ed8f78c5e7c16d98d

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
packager-627d61a7.zip (1.93 MB)
Author(s)
Wang, Peidong
•
Holloway, Tracey
•
Bindl, Matilyn
•
Harkey, Monica
•
De Smedt, Isabelle
Date Issued
May 4, 2022
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citation
Remote Sensing 14 (9): 2191 (2022)
Version
Final published version
Abstract
This study evaluates formaldehyde (HCHO) over the U.S. from 2006 to 2015 by comparing ground monitor data from the Air Quality System (AQS) and a satellite retrieval from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI). Our comparison focuses on the utility of satellite data to inform patterns, trends, and processes of ground-based HCHO across the U.S. We find that cities with higher levels of biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOC) emissions, including primary HCHO, exhibit larger HCHO diurnal amplitudes in surface observations. These differences in hour-to-hour variability in surface HCHO suggests that satellite agreement with ground-based data may depend on the distribution of emission sources. On a seasonal basis, OMI exhibits the highest correlation with AQS in summer and the lowest correlation in winter. The ratios of HCHO in summer versus other seasons show pronounced seasonal variability in OMI, likely due to seasonal changes in the vertical HCHO distribution. The seasonal variability in HCHO from satellite is more pronounced than at the surface, with seasonal variability 20–100% larger in satellite than surface observations. The seasonal variability also has a latitude dependency, with more variability in higher latitude regions. OMI agrees with AQS on the interannual variability in certain periods, whereas AQS and OMI do not show a consistent decadal trend. This is possibly due to a rather large interannual variability in HCHO, which makes the small decadal drift less significant. Temperature also explains part of the interannual variabilities. Small temperature variations in the western U.S. are reflected with more quiescent HCHO interannual variability in that region. The decrease in summertime HCHO in the southeast U.S. could also be partially explained by a small and negative trend in local temperatures.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/142520
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092191
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.