Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Incremental Scheduling with Upper and Lowerbound Temporospatial Constraints

Incremental Scheduling with Upper and Lowerbound Temporospatial Constraints

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Shah_Incremental scheduling.pdf

Size

566.22 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

2aaba13780b4c2cd49a5ad9bbaf92368

Author(s)
Sturla, Giancarlo F.
•
Gombolay, Matthew Craig
•
Shah, Julie A
Date Issued
January 2016
Journal
AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace
Publisher
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Citation
Sturla, Giancarlo, Matthew Gombolay, and Julie A. Shah. “Incremental Scheduling with Upper and Lowerbound Temporospatial Constraints.” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Responding quickly and efficiently to dynamic disturbances is a crucial challenge in domains such as manufacturing, aerial and underwater vehicle tasking, and health care. In many cases, accurately capturing the complicated dependencies between tasks in these environments requires the use of upper and lowerbound temporal constraints (i.e, deadlines and wait constraints). However, optimally scheduling tasks related by upper and lowerbound temporal constraints is known to be NP-Hard.3 While exact solution techniques exist to efficiently schedule resources, these techniques are computationally intractable for problems of interest with fifty or more tasks and five agents. Furthermore, techniques that seek to improve scalability often attempt to distribute the scheduling problem amongst the agents, where each agent generates its own schedule.5 However, when agents must share unary-access resources (e.g., a spatial location that can be occupied by only one agent at a time), these techniques lose their advantage because the problems do not naturally lend themselves to decomposition. As a result, many techniques work by first finding an initial, though possibly infeasible, schedule through solving a relaxed version of the problem, and then repairing the schedule to resolve any constraint violations.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106533
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0131
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.