On the Ungrammaticality of Remnant Movement in the Derivation of Greenberg's Universal 20
Name
Steddy-2011-On the Ungrammaticality.pdf
Size
969.15 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
2ee76aa55970ac73d987bd3447ffd9d1
Author(s) •
Steddy, Samuel Joseph
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
Date Issued
July 2011
Journal
Linguistic Inquiry
Publisher
MIT Press
Citation
Steddy, Sam, and Vieri Samek-Lodovici. “On the Ungrammaticality of Remnant Movement in the Derivation of Greenberg’s Universal 20.” Linguistic Inquiry 42 (2011): 445-469. © 2011 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
We propose an analysis that derives Cinque's (2005) typology of linear orders involving a demonstrative, numeral, adjective, and noun through four Optimality Theory constraints requiring leftward alignment of these items. We show that remnant movement is ungrammatical whenever it produces universally suboptimal alignments, compared with remnant-movement-free structures. Any movement is permitted, but only the best alignment configurations surface as grammatical. We also show that Cinque's original analysis must encode the structural derivations of all attested orders as parametric values of the associated languages. Our analysis need not make similar structural stipulations, as the different attested structures emerge from constraint reranking.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00053