Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. The Sunk Carbon Fallacy: Rethinking Carbon Footprint Metrics for Effective Carbon-Aware Scheduling

The Sunk Carbon Fallacy: Rethinking Carbon Footprint Metrics for Effective Carbon-Aware Scheduling

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

3698038.3698542.pdf

Size

612.92 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

964d12cc22d49b9beff3c86ff529d475

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
3698038.3698542.zip (581.12 KB)
Author(s)
Bashir, Noman
•
Gohil, Varun
•
Shahrad, Mohammad
•
Irwin, David
•
Subramanya, Anagha Belavadi
•
Olivetti, Elsa
•
Delimitrou, Christina
Date Issued
November 20, 2024
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
Citation
Noman Bashir, Varun Gohil, Anagha Belavadi Subramanya, Mohammad Shahrad, David Irwin, Elsa Olivetti, and Christina Delimitrou. 2024. The Sunk Carbon Fallacy: Rethinking Carbon Footprint Metrics for Effective Carbon-Aware Scheduling. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing (SoCC '24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 542–551.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The rapid increase in computing demand and corresponding energy consumption have focused attention on computing's impact on the climate and sustainability. Prior work proposes metrics that quantify computing's carbon footprint across several lifecycle phases, including its supply chain, operation, and end-of-life. Industry uses these metrics to optimize the carbon footprint of manufacturing hardware and running computing applications. Unfortunately, prior work on optimizing datacenters' carbon footprint often succumbs to the sunk cost fallacy by considering embodied carbon emissions (a sunk cost) when making operational decisions (i.e., job scheduling and placement), which leads to operational decisions that do not always reduce the total carbon footprint. In this paper, we evaluate carbon-aware job scheduling and placement on a given set of servers for several carbon accounting metrics. Our analysis reveals state-of-the-art carbon accounting metrics that include embodied carbon emissions when making operational decisions can increase the total carbon footprint of executing a set of jobs. We study the factors that affect the added carbon cost of such suboptimal decision-making. We then use a real-world case study from a datacenter to demonstrate how the sunk carbon fallacy manifests itself in practice. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings in better guiding effective carbon-aware scheduling in on-premise and cloud datacenters.
Description
SoCC ’24, November 20–22, 2024, Redmond, WA, USA
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/171084
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1145/3698038.3698542
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.