Vsevolod Meyerhold : modernism, mass culture and the Russian avante garde stage
Name
30770400-MIT.pdf
Description
Full printable version
Size
20.05 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
5d959635db050d175ae336bf2dc7af17
Author(s)
Holmes, Jeffrey, M.S. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Advisor(s)
Benjamin Buchloh.
Date Issued
1994
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
As early as 1907, Russian director Vsevolod Meyerhold writes of the need to renovate the theater by "means of new forms and new methods of scenic presentation" predicated on the "collective enterprise" of the author, director, actor and audience. The "new forms and new methods" that Meyerhold refers to undergo an astonishing number of transformations throughout his career as does his understanding of what exactly constitutes a "collective enterprise". While contemporary critics continue to fold Meyerhold's investigation into the modernist paradigm of self-reflexive criticality and autonomy, this thesis claims that Meyerhold's activity, like that of the Russian and Soviet avant-garde, must be considered as nothing less than a willful attempt to constitute fundamentally new modes of theatrical production, dissemination and reception. This thesis tracks the development of Meyerhold's work. First, we will investigate the parallel development of formalist theory in literary criticism and the emergence of high modernism on the Russian stage. Second, we will complicate this formalist description by demonstrating its paradoxical maintenance of the "low". In Meyerhold's work this is manifested in his attempt to reimbue the stage with ritualistic forms of folk experience through the grotesque. Third, we will consider biomechanics, stage constructivism and their impact in transforming the grotesque. The fourth and last section of the thesis will analyze Meyerhold's transformation of audience and author relationships as theorized in the positions of productivism.
Description
Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1994.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 175-178).
Subjects
Architecture.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
Terms of Use
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
Persistent DSpace Link
