Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Faster Feedback with AI? A Test Prioritization Study

Faster Feedback with AI? A Test Prioritization Study

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

3660829.3660837.pdf

Size

797.23 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

086ce636d69882ce02bf87c166b631c5

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
3660829.3660837.zip (693.1 KB)
Author(s)
Mattis, Toni
•
B?hme, Lukas
•
Krebs, Eva
•
Rinard, Martin C.
•
Hirschfeld, Robert
Date Issued
March 11, 2024
Publisher
ACM|Companion Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming
Citation
Mattis, Toni, B?hme, Lukas, Krebs, Eva, Rinard, Martin C. and Hirschfeld, Robert. 2024. "Faster Feedback with AI? A Test Prioritization Study."
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Feedback during programming is desirable, but its usefulness depends on immediacy and relevance to the task. Unit and regression testing are practices to ensure programmers can obtain feedback on their changes; however, running a large test suite is rarely fast, and only a few results are relevant. Identifying tests relevant to a change can help programmers in two ways: upcoming issues can be detected earlier during programming, and relevant tests can serve as examples to help programmers understand the code they are editing. In this work, we describe an approach to evaluate how well large language models (LLMs) and embedding models can judge the relevance of a test to a change. We construct a dataset by applying faulty variations of real-world code changes and measuring whether the model could nominate the failing tests beforehand. We found that, while embedding models perform best on such a task, even simple information retrieval models are surprisingly competitive. In contrast, pre-trained LLMs are of limited use as they focus on confounding aspects like coding styles. We argue that the high computational cost of AI models is not always justified, and tool developers should also consider non-AI models for code-related retrieval and recommendation tasks. Lastly, we generalize from unit tests to live examples and outline how our approach can benefit live programming environments.
Description
‹Programming›Companion ’24, March 11–15, 2024, Lund, Sweden
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155934
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1145/3660829.3660837
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.