LANCET: labeling complex data at scale
Name
3476249.3476269.pdf
Description
Published version
Size
695.08 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
f429a0ba868822783090dcabcc307c75
Author(s) • • •
Zhang, Huayi
Cao, Lei
Madden, Samuel
Rundensteiner, Elke
Date Issued
2021
Journal
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
Publisher
VLDB Endowment
Citation
Zhang, Huayi, Cao, Lei, Madden, Samuel and Rundensteiner, Elke. 2021. "LANCET: labeling complex data at scale." Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 14 (11).
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Cutting-edge machine learning techniques often require millions of labeled data objects to train a robust model. Because relying on humans to supply such a huge number of labels is rarely practical, automated methods for label generation are needed. Unfortunately, critical challenges in auto-labeling remain unsolved, including the following research questions: (1) which objects to ask humans to label, (2) how to automatically propagate labels to other objects, and (3) when to stop labeling. These three questions are not only each challenging in their own right, but they also correspond to tightly interdependent problems. Yet existing techniques provide at best isolated solutions to a subset of these challenges. In this work, we propose the first approach, called LANCET, that successfully addresses all three challenges in an integrated framework. LANCET is based on a theoretical foundation characterizing the properties that the labeled dataset must satisfy to train an effective prediction model, namely the Covariate-shift and the Continuity conditions. First, guided by the Covariate-shift condition, LANCET maps raw input data into a semantic feature space, where an unlabeled object is expected to share the same label with its near-by labeled neighbor. Next, guided by the Continuity condition, LANCET selects objects for labeling, aiming to ensure that unlabeled objects always have some sufficiently close labeled neighbors. These two strategies jointly maximize the accuracy of the automatically produced labels and the prediction accuracy of the machine learning models trained on these labels. Lastly, LANCET uses a distribution matching network to verify whether both the Covariate-shift and Continuity conditions hold, in which case it would be safe to terminate the labeling process. Our experiments on diverse public data sets demonstrate that LANCET consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art methods from Snuba to GOGGLES and other baselines by a large margin - up to 30 percentage points increase in accuracy.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.14778/3476249.3476269