Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Are Fuel Economy Standards Regressive?

Are Fuel Economy Standards Regressive?

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Knittel_Are Fuel Economy Standards Regressive.pdf

Description
Submitted version
Size

497.02 KB

Format

Unknown

Checksum (MD5)

ac8b74cffac32a7055fbedcc44b688cf

sword-2019-09-17T12:27:43.original.xml (130 B)
Original SWORD entry document
Author(s)
Davis, Lucas W.
•
Knittel, Christopher R.
Date Issued
January 2019
Journal
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Version
Original manuscript
Abstract
© 2018 by The Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. Despite widespread agreement that a carbon tax would be more efficient, many countries use fuel economy standards to reduce transportation-related carbon dioxide emissions. We pair a simple model of the automakers’ profit maximization problem with unusually rich nationally representative data on vehicle registrations to estimate the distributional impact of US fuel economy standards. The key insight from the model is that fuel economy standards impose a constraint on automakers that creates an implicit subsidy for fuel-efficient vehicles and an implicit tax for fuel-inefficient vehicles. Moreover, when these obligations are tradable, permit prices make it possible to quantify the exact magnitude of these implicit subsidies and taxes. We use the model to determine which vehicles are most subsidized and taxed, and we compare the pattern of ownership of these vehicles between high-and low-income census tracts. Finally, we compare these distributional impacts with existing estimates in the literature for a carbon tax.
MIT Department
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135717.2
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1086/701187
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.