Luck and the Law: Quantifying Chance in Fantasy Sports and Other Contests
Name
16m1102094.pdf
Size
3.06 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
e4ed9035df642bf094e45668d4ca506d
Author(s) • • • •
Yano, Masayuki
Getty, Daniel E.
Li, Hao
Gao, Charles
Hosoi, Anette E
Date Issued
November 2018
Journal
SIAM Review
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Citation
Getty, Daniel, Hao Li, Masayuki Yano, Charles Gao, and A. E. Hosoi. “Luck and the Law: Quantifying Chance in Fantasy Sports and Other Contests.” SIAM Review 60, no. 4 (January 2018): 869–887. © 2018 SIAM.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
One of the consequences of this recent rapid growth is increased scrutiny surrounding the legal aspects of the games, which typically hinge on the relative roles of skill and chance in the outcome of a competition. While there are many ethical and legal arguments that enter into the debate, the answer to the skill versus chance question is grounded in mathematics. Motivated by this ongoing dialogue we analyze data from daily fantasy competitions played on FanDuel during the 2013 and 2014 seasons and propose a new metric to quantify the relative roles of skill and chance in games and other activities. This metric is applied to FanDuel data and to simulated seasons that are generated using Monte Carlo methods; results from real and simulated data are compared to an analytic approximation which estimates the impact of skill in contests in which players participate in a large number of games. We then apply this metric to professional sports, fantasy sports, cyclocross racing, coin flipping, and mutual fund data to determine the relative placement of all of these activities on a skill-luck spectrum.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1102094