Advancing the Use of Passive Sampling in Risk Assessment and Management of Sediments Contaminated with Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals: Results of an International Ex Situ Passive Sampling Interlaboratory Comparison
Name
acs.est.7b05752.pdf
Size
2.57 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
8812e23361c16d56286148de83a811e4
Author(s) • • • • • • • • •
Jonker, Michiel T. O.
van der Heijden, Stephan A.
Adelman, Dave
Choi, Yongju
Flavetta, Geanna M.
Ghosh, Upal
Hale, Sarah E.
Jalalizadeh, Mehregan
Khairy, Mohammed
Lampi, Mark A.
Date Issued
February 2018
Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Citation
Jonker, Michiel T. O., Stephan A. van der Heijden, Dave Adelman, Jennifer N. Apell, Robert M. Burgess, Yongju Choi, Loretta A. Fernandez, et al. “Advancing the Use of Passive Sampling in Risk Assessment and Management of Sediments Contaminated with Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals: Results of an International Ex Situ Passive Sampling Interlaboratory Comparison.” Environmental Science & Technology 52, no. 6 (February 28, 2018): 3574–3582.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
This work presents the results of an international interlaboratory comparison on ex situ passive sampling in sediments. The main objectives were to map the state of the science in passively sampling sediments, identify sources of variability, provide recommendations and practical guidance for standardized passive sampling, and advance the use of passive sampling in regulatory decision making by increasing confidence in the use of the technique. The study was performed by a consortium of 11 laboratories and included experiments with 14 passive sampling formats on 3 sediments for 25 target chemicals (PAHs and PCBs). The resulting overall interlaboratory variability was large (a factor of ∼10), but standardization of methods halved this variability. The remaining variability was primarily due to factors not related to passive sampling itself, i.e., sediment heterogeneity and analytical chemistry. Excluding the latter source of variability, by performing all analyses in one laboratory, showed that passive sampling results can have a high precision and a very low intermethod variability (
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.EST.7B05752