When cyclic coordinate descent outperforms randomized coordinate descent
Name
7275-when-cyclic-coordinate-descent-outperforms-randomized-coordinate-descent.pdf
Description
Published version
Size
915.2 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
e976fe8e18e154b35db4d467d0968b2d
Author(s) • • •
Gurbuzbalaban, Mert
Ozdaglar, Asuman E
Parrilo, Pablo A.
Vanli, Nuri Denizcan
Date Issued
December 2017
Journal
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017)
Publisher
Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc.
Citation
Gürbüzbalaban, Mert, Asuman Ozdaglar, Pablo A. Parrilo and N. Denizcan Vanli. "When cyclic coordinate descent outperforms randomized coordinate descent." Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, Dec. 4-9 2017.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The coordinate descent (CD) method is a classical optimization algorithm that has seen a revival of interest because of its competitive performance in machine learning applications. A number of recent papers provided convergence rate estimates for their deterministic (cyclic) and randomized variants that differ in the selection of update coordinates. These estimates suggest randomized coordinate descent (RCD) performs better than cyclic coordinate descent (CCD), although numerical experiments do not provide clear justification for this comparison. In this paper, we provide examples and more generally problem classes for which CCD (or CD with any deterministic order) is faster than RCD in terms of asymptotic worst-case convergence. Furthermore, we provide lower and upper bounds on the amount of improvement on the rate of CCD relative to RCD, which depends on the deterministic order used. We also provide a characterization of the best deterministic order (that leads to the maximum improvement in convergence rate) in terms of the combinatorial properties of the Hessian matrix of the objective function.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://papers.nips.cc/paper/7275-when-cyclic-coordinate-descent-outperforms-randomized-coordinate-descent