Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Operations Research Center
  3. Operations Research Center Working Papers
  4. Dynamic Ground-Holding Policies for a Network of Airports

Dynamic Ground-Holding Policies for a Network of Airports

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

OR-265-92.pdf

Size

1.92 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

dcb5998d2a3ad6d44c24c8d7fa5dc695

Author(s)
Vranas, Peter B.
•
Bertsimas, Dimitris J.
•
Odoni, Amedeo R.
Date Issued
June 1992
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Center
Series/Report no.
Operations Research Center Working Paper;OR 265-92
Abstract
The yearly congestion costs in the US airline industry are estimated to be of the order of $2 billion. In [6] we have introduced and studied generic integer programming models for the static multi-airport ground holding problem (GHP), the problem of assigning optimal ground holding delays in a general network of airports, so that the total (ground plus airborne) delay cost of all flights is minimized. The present paper is the first attempt to address the multi-airport GHP in a dynamic environment. We propose optimal or near-optimal algorithms to update ground-holding decisions as time progresses and more accurate weather (hence capacity) forecasts become available. We propose several pure IP formulations (most of them 0-1), which have the important advantages of being remarkably compact while capturing the essential aspects of the problem and of being sufficiently flexible to accommodate various degrees of modeling detail. For example, one formulation allows the dynamic updating of the mix between departure and arrival capacities by modifying runway use. These formulations enable one to assign and dynamically update ground holds to a sizable portion of the network of the major congested U.S. or European airports. We also present structural insights on the behaviour of the problem by means of computational results, and we find that our methods perform much better than a heuristic which may approximate, to some extent, current ground-holding practices.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Operations Research Center
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5213
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.