Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Energy transition and equity: Quantifying pathways to building decarbonization based on notions of fairness

Energy transition and equity: Quantifying pathways to building decarbonization based on notions of fairness

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Energy transition and equity.pdf

Description
Published version
Size

15.55 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

957301696170f08aa8adf6e2157e2ab8

Author(s)
De Simone, Zoe
•
Arcaya, Mariana
•
Reinhart, Christoph
Date Issued
November 2025
Journal
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Buildings are significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for nearly 40 % of the total. This makes decarbonizing the building sector crucial for reaching carbon-neutrality by 2050. While federal US tax incentives support a variety of upgrades, deep retrofitting all US single-family homes would cost approximately $240 billion, exceeding available public funds. The question therefore is how to best allocate limited public funds. The prevailing equality-based approach, which provides equal support to all homeowners, inherently favors higher-income groups, perpetuating inequality. Alternatively, focusing incentives on disadvantaged households risks depleting funds before economies of scale are fully realized. To develop incentive structures that balance long-term building-related carbon emissions and equity, we propose a model that combines a physics-based urban building energy model (UBEM) with US homeowners’ willingness-to-pay predictions and a spectrum of incentive policies. Using Oshkosh, WI, as a case study, we explore the philosophical, economic, political, and mathematical dimensions of creating just and effective decarbonization policies that ensure healthy, low-carbon homes for all. Our findings reveal that our evidence-based policy framework facilitates the achievement of concurrent carbon reduction and equity goals, allows to compare policies on the bases of long-term community impact, as well as avoid potential policy pitfalls of over and under incentivization.
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/167186
DOI of Published Version
10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114798
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.