Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
  3. Working Papers
  4. The SO2 Allowance Trading System: The Ironic History of a Grand Policy Experiment

The SO2 Allowance Trading System: The Ironic History of a Grand Policy Experiment

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

2012-012.pdf

Description
main article
Size

600.32 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

8a05a2925cef1f00c1199e279b5d9ec4

Author(s)
Schmalensee, Richard
•
Stavins, Robert N.
Date Issued
August 2012
Publisher
MIT CEEPR
Citation
CEEPR-WP-2012-012
Series/Report no.
CEEPR Working Papers;2012-012
Abstract
Two decades have passed Two decades have passed since the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 launched a grand experiment in market-based environmental policy: the SO2 cap-and-trade system. That system performed well but created four striking ironies. First, by creating this system to reduce SO2 emissions to curb acid rain, the government did the right thing for the wrong reason. Second, a substantial source of this system’s cost-effectiveness was an unanticipated consequence of earlier railroad deregulation. Third, it is ironic that cap-and-trade has come to be demonized by conservative politicians in recent years, since this market-based, cost-effective policy innovation was initially championed and implemented by Republican administrations. Fourth, court decisions and subsequent regulatory responses have led to the collapse of the SO2 market, demonstrating that what the government gives, the government can take away. since the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 launched a grand experiment in market-based environmental policy: the SO2 cap-and-trade system. That system performed well but created four striking ironies. First, by creating this system to reduce SO2 emissions to curb acid rain, the government did the right thing for the wrong reason. Second, a substantial source of this system’s cost-effectiveness was an unanticipated consequence of earlier railroad deregulation. Third, it is ironic that cap-and-trade has come to be demonized by conservative politicians in recent years, since this market-based, cost-effective policy innovation was initially championed and implemented by Republican administrations. Fourth, court decisions and subsequent regulatory responses have led to the collapse of the SO2 market, demonstrating that what the government gives, the government can take away.
Terms of Use
An error occurred on the license name.
An error occurred getting the license - uri.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72007
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.