Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Impact of Bayesian Priors on the Characterization of Binary Black Hole Coalescences

Impact of Bayesian Priors on the Characterization of Binary Black Hole Coalescences

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

PhysRevLett.119.251103.pdf

Size

535.46 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

dd5e1213dea269f00afc870056860340

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
PhysRevLett.119.251103-mets.zip (446.02 KB)
Author(s)
Gerosa, Davide
•
Haster, Carl-Johan
•
Chatziioannou, Katerina
•
Zimmerman, Aaron
•
Vitale, Salvatore
Date Issued
December 2017
Journal
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
American Physical Society
Citation
Vitale, Salvatore, et al. “Impact of Bayesian Priors on the Characterization of Binary Black Hole Coalescences.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 119, no. 25, Dec. 2017. © 2017 American Physical Society
Version
Final published version
Abstract
In a regime where data are only mildly informative, prior choices can play a significant role in Bayesian statistical inference, potentially affecting the inferred physics. We show this is indeed the case for some of the parameters inferred from current gravitational-wave measurements of binary black hole coalescences. We reanalyze the first detections performed by the twin LIGO interferometers using alternative (and astrophysically motivated) prior assumptions. We find different prior distributions can introduce deviations in the resulting posteriors that impact the physical interpretation of these systems. For instance, (i) limits on the 90% credible interval on the effective black hole spin χ[subscript eff] are subject to variations of ∼10% if a prior with black hole spins mostly aligned to the binary’s angular momentum is considered instead of the standard choice of isotropic spin directions, and (ii) under priors motivated by the initial stellar mass function, we infer tighter constraints on the black hole masses, and in particular, we find no support for any of the inferred masses within the putative mass gap M≲5  M[subscript ⊙].
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
LIGO (Observatory : Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114287
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251103
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.