Robust post-stall perching with a simple fixed-wing glider using LQR-Trees
Name
Tedrake_Robust post-stall.pdf
Size
2.38 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
827a279b34f5744a09b82f2c321573fc
Author(s) • •
Moore, Joseph
Cory, Rick
Tedrake, Russell Louis
Date Issued
May 2014
Journal
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Citation
Moore, Joseph, Rick Cory, and Russ Tedrake. “Robust Post-Stall Perching with a Simple Fixed-Wing Glider Using LQR-Trees.” Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 9, no. 2 (May 22, 2014): 025013.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Birds routinely execute post-stall maneuvers with a speed and precision far beyond the capabilities of our best aircraft control systems. One remarkable example is a bird exploiting post-stall pressure drag in order to rapidly decelerate to land on a perch. Stall is typically associated with a loss of control authority, and it is tempting to attribute this agility of birds to the intricate morphology of the wings and tail, to their precision sensing apparatus, or their ability to perform thrust vectoring. Here we ask whether an extremely simple fixed-wing glider (no propeller) with only a single actuator in the tail is capable of landing precisely on a perch from a large range of initial conditions. To answer this question, we focus on the design of the flight control system; building upon previous work which used linear feedback control design based on quadratic regulators (LQR), we develop nonlinear feedback control based on nonlinear model-predictive control and 'LQR-Trees'. Through simulation using a flat-plate model of the glider, we find that both nonlinear methods are capable of achieving an accurate bird-like perching maneuver from a large range of initial conditions; the 'LQR-Trees' algorithm is particularly useful due to its low computational burden at runtime and its inherent performance guarantees. With this in mind, we then implement the 'LQR-Trees' algorithm on real hardware and demonstrate a 95 percent perching success rate over 147 flights for a wide range of initial speeds. These results suggest that, at least in the absence of significant disturbances like wind gusts, complex wing morphology and sensing are not strictly required to achieve accurate and robust perching even in the post-stall flow regime.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/9/2/025013