Educators’ motivations in massive open online courses for professional development
Name
10639_2024_12590_ReferencePDF.pdf
Size
1.04 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
efc21d38fc13935f1ea12846eb5c1c97
Author(s)
Anghel, Ella
Littenberg-Tobias, Joshua
von Davier, Matthias
Date Issued
March 18, 2024
Journal
Education and Information Technologies
Publisher
Springer US
Citation
Anghel, E., Littenberg-Tobias, J. & von Davier, M. Educators’ motivations in massive open online courses for professional development. Educ Inf Technol 29, 1–25 (2024).
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are increasingly popular for teachers’ professional development (PD). Understanding why teachers take MOOCs and how this relates to course completion could help identify underserved needs in teachers’ professional learning. In the current study, we explored this question, as well as potential gaps between intention to complete the course and actual completion. Using a sample of 3,212 participants in four PD MOOCs, we applied topic modeling to open-ended and Likert-style data to identify teachers’ motivations. The results show that most participants had intrinsic or professional motivations, but a subgroup of participants had prosocial motivations, namely, they wanted to support their students. In a set of logistic regression predicting course completion, we found that participants with intrinsic motivations were less likely to complete a course and participants with prosocial motivations were more likely to do so even after controlling for their initial intention. Our study contributes to the field by, first, identifying an underexplored group of learners, the prosocial learners. More research is needed to better understand this group. We also found that among teachers taking MOOCs, intrinsic motivations were associated with lower levels of engagement, contrary to findings in other populations, making a contribution to motivation theory as well as online learning practice. We concluded that the motivation-engagement relationship is more complex than previously thought, and recommend researchers continue examining this association to understand this discrepancy. Finally, we suggest practitioners take learners’ a-priori motivations into account when designing MOOCs, as these could be important for course engagement.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Teaching and Learning Laboratory
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12590-6
