Tradespace exploration of in-space communications network architectures
Name
davison15b.pdf
Size
906.38 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
9af57be15999b610a5ae30f7ea485f95
Author(s) • •
Crawley, Edward F.
Davison, Peter Leslie
Cameron, Bruce Gregory
Date Issued
August 2016
Journal
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Citation
Davison, Peter et al. “Tradespace Exploration of in-Space Communications Network Architectures.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29, 6 (August 2016): 583–599 © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Making architectural decisions in long lifecycle systems is challenging because the time between system definition and end of operations can span multiple decades, resulting in shifts in stakeholder needs and major advances in technologies. Space-based communications using relay satellite constellations is one such example, requiring substantial up-front planning to define capabilities and size capacity due to the large investment of time and resources. Additionally, there are numerous viable system architectures. In this paper, we build on existing methods to develop a graph-based decision method to assess and explore architectural flexibility in the future evolution of long lifecycle systems. The tradespace graph defines edges between similar architectures, quantifies the switching cost between architectures, using graphs to analyse the potential system evolution pathways. In a test case on NASA communication satellites, we find that hosting government communications payloads, in particular optical payloads, on commercial satellites could reduce cost and increase flexibility of the NASA network. Keywords: Space communications; communications architectures; tradespace exploration; decision-making; NASA TDRS network
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1217322