Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Origins of Divergent Cycling Trajectories of Lithium Metal Anodes Revealed by Titration Methods

Origins of Divergent Cycling Trajectories of Lithium Metal Anodes Revealed by Titration Methods

Thumbnail Image
Request a copy
Name

manuscript_final.pdf

Size

1.25 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

3c870b1137f1e114f82e7f87a2b8beac

Thumbnail Image
Request a copy
Name

SI_final.pdf

Size

2.41 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

f5a6b990664d108e8c6a0fd1d0e5f6dc

Author(s)
Steinberg, Katherine
•
Ross, Stephanie
•
Gallant, Betar
Date Issued
August 19, 2026
Journal
Chemistry of Materials
Publisher
American Chemical Society
Citation
Katherine Steinberg, Stephanie N. Ross, Betar M. Gallant; Origins of Divergent Cycling Trajectories of Lithium Metal Anodes Revealed by Titration Methods. Chem. Mater. 2026.
Abstract
Despite their near-ubiquitous use as additives in carbonate-based electrolytes for Li-ion batteries, the divergent effects of vinylene carbonate (VC) and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) on the cycling performance of Li metal anodes is not fully understood. Here, we employed cycle-by-cycle titration-based analysis to interrogate the evolving cycling performance of a baseline carbonate electrolyte (1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate/diethyl carbonate, 1:1 v/v, “LP40”) without and with the addition of VC or FEC. FEC led to both higher and more consistent Coulombic efficiencies (CE) compared to the baseline, while VC generated no significant improvement in CE and more erratic cycling. These differences originated in different relative rates of inactive Li0 accumulation, as all three electrolytes formed SEI at the same rate. Further SEI analysis revealed that although all three electrolytes formed Li2O initially, only LP40 + FEC continued generating it throughout cycling; LP40 + FEC also had the densest deposit morphology, least resistive SEI, and most LiF formation. Together, these observations combine to reveal how subtle differences in SEI dramatically alter CE trajectories: the Li2O- and LiF-rich, ionically conductive SEI generated by FEC promotes dense deposits and stable, high-efficiency Li0 removal, while VC’s more resistive SEI culminates in mossy deposits, progressively deteriorating surface stability, and inefficient stripping.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/172927
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6c01713
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.