Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. When to Ask a Question: Understanding Communication Strategies in Generative AI Tools

When to Ask a Question: Understanding Communication Strategies in Generative AI Tools

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

3708319.3733711.pdf

Size

707.46 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

f6df7dcc31a1336c4913979765159877

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
3708319.3733711.zip (621.87 KB)
Author(s)
Park, Charlotte
•
Donahue, Kate
•
Raghavan, Manish
Date Issued
June 12, 2025
Publisher
ACM|Adjunct Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
Citation
Charlotte Park, Kate Donahue, and Manish Raghavan. 2025. When to Ask a Question: Understanding Communication Strategies in Generative AI Tools. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP Adjunct '25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 288–299.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Generative AI tools (GAITs) fundamentally differ from traditional machine learning tools in that they allow users to provide as much or as little information as they choose in their inputs. This flexibility often leads users to omit certain details, relying on the GAIT to infer and fill in less critical information based on distributional knowledge of user preferences. Inferences about preferences lead to natural questions about fairness, since a GAIT’s “best guess” may skew towards the preferences of larger groups at the expense of smaller ones. Unlike more traditional recommender systems, GAITs can acquire additional information about a user’s preferences through feedback or by explicitly soliciting it. This creates an interesting communication challenge: the user is aware of their specific preference, while the GAIT has knowledge of the overall distribution of preferences, and both parties can only exchange a limited amount of information. In this work, we present a mathematical model to describe human-AI co-creation of content under information asymmetry. Our results suggest that GAITs can use distributional information about overall preferences to determine the “right” questions to ask to maximize both welfare and fairness, opening up a rich design space in human-AI collaboration.
Description
UMAP Adjunct ’25, New York City, NY, USA
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/164413
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1145/3708319.3733711
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.