Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Mitigating Health Disparities After Natural Disasters: Lessons From The RISK Project: Study examines mitigating health disparities after natural disasters.
This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found here.

Mitigating Health Disparities After Natural Disasters: Lessons From The RISK Project: Study examines mitigating health disparities after natural disasters.

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

nihms-1744835.pdf

Description
Accepted version
Size

75.22 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

dc7849499704ca743ea9b76c241212a2

sword-2022-02-01T14:07:04.original.xml (130 B)
Original SWORD entry document
Author(s)
Raker, Ethan J
•
Arcaya, Mariana C
•
Lowe, Sarah R
•
Zacher, Meghan
•
Rhodes, Jean
•
Waters, Mary C
Date Issued
2020
Journal
Health Affairs
Publisher
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
Citation
Raker, Ethan J, Arcaya, Mariana C, Lowe, Sarah R, Zacher, Meghan, Rhodes, Jean et al. 2020. "Mitigating Health Disparities After Natural Disasters: Lessons From The RISK Project: Study examines mitigating health disparities after natural disasters.." Health Affairs, 39 (12).
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
© 2020, Project HOPE. All rights reserved. Climate change exacerbates the severity of natural disasters, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. Mitigating disasters’ health consequences is critical to promoting health equity, but few studies have isolated the short-and long-term effects of disasters on vulnerable groups. We filled this gap by conducting a fifteen-year (2003– 2018) prospective study of low-income, predominantly Black parents who experienced Hurricane Katrina: the Resilience in Survivors of Katrina (RISK) Project. Here we describe this project and synthesize lessons from work that has resulted from it. Our findings can guide policy makers, service providers, and health officials in disaster planning and response. We synthesize them into an organizational schema of five priorities: Primary efforts should be aimed at preventing exposure to trauma through investments in climate resilience and by eliminating impediments to evacuation, health care policies should promote uninterrupted and expanded access to care, social services should integrate and strive to reduce the administrative burden on survivors, programs should aid survivors in forging or strengthening connections to their communities, and policy makers should fund targeted long-term services for highly affected survivors.
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/139818
DOI of Published Version
10.1377/HLTHAFF.2020.01161
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.