Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  3. Artificial Intelligence Lab Publications
  4. AI Technical Reports (1964 - 2004)
  5. Theories of Comparative Analysis

Theories of Comparative Analysis

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

AITR-1035.pdf

Size

7.87 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

82cb2dae9dd94c5e81a892f761c27a87

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

AITR-1035.ps

Size

21.13 MB

Format

PostScript

Checksum (MD5)

606feb5e85805837c457e5f8469433b2

Author(s)
Weld, Daniel S.
Date Issued
May 1, 1988
Series/Report no.
AITR-1035
Abstract
Comparative analysis is the problem of predicting how a system will react to perturbations in its parameters, and why. For example, comparative analysis could be asked to explain why the period of an oscillating spring/block system would increase if the mass of the block were larger. This thesis formalizes the task of comparative analysis and presents two solution techniques: differential qualitative (DQ) analysis and exaggeration. Both techniques solve many comparative analysis problems, providing explanations suitable for use by design systems, automated diagnosis, intelligent tutoring systems, and explanation based generalization. This thesis explains the theoretical basis for each technique, describes how they are implemented, and discusses the difference between the two. DQ analysis is sound; it never generates an incorrect answer to a comparative analysis question. Although exaggeration does occasionally produce misleading answers, it solves a larger class of problems than DQ analysis and frequently results in simpler explanations.
Subjects
qualitative analysis
causal reasoning
comparativesanalysis
DQ analysis
exaggeration
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6846
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.