Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology

Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Jaeger-2011-Mixed effect models.pdf

Size

5.56 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

d7d142b0833fa09cfda7df6c25f4bef2

Author(s)
Jaeger, T. Florian
•
Graff, Peter
•
Croft, William
•
Pontillo, Daniel
Date Issued
November 2011
Journal
Linguistic Typology
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter
Citation
Jaeger, T. Florian, Peter Graff, William Croft, and Daniel Pontillo. “Mixed Effect Models for Genetic and Areal Dependencies in Linguistic Typology.” Linguistic Typology 15, no. 2 (January 2011). © 2011 Walter de Gruyter.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
1. Introduction 1.1. Summary of Atkinson 2011 Atkinson (2011) sets out to test the so-called “serial founder model” against crosslinguistic data on phonological diversity. In his words (Atkinson 2011: Supporting Online Material: 3), the serial founder model predicts that [. . . ] during population expansion, small founder groups are expected to carry less phonemic diversity than their larger parent populations. A series of founder events should produce a gradient of decreasing phonemic diversity with increasing distance from the origin. To test this hypothesis, Atkinson employs a sample of 504 non-extinct languages from WALS (Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2008), for which the number of vowels, the number of consonants, and the number of tones in the language are annotated (Maddieson 2008a, b, c). For the main analysis, these three measures were standardized (i.e., the mean was subtracted from each value, which was then divided by the standard deviation of the measure) and averaged into one combined measure of the total phonological diversity of a language. This normalized phonological diversity measure ranges from −1.19 to 1.68 (mean =0.02). Each language is also annotated for its coordinates on the globe as well as it population size (the number of speakers).
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103092
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2011.021
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.