Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  3. Artificial Intelligence Lab Publications
  4. AI Memos (1959 - 2004)
  5. Perceptual Evaluation of Video-Realistic Speech

Perceptual Evaluation of Video-Realistic Speech

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

AIM-2003-003.pdf

Size

1.3 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

e7a7a2fdcc481f4865bd61af87c1d770

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

AIM-2003-003.ps

Size

1.45 MB

Format

PostScript

Checksum (MD5)

be535b3c56fffa6396a600a85c3c7605

Author(s)
Geiger, Gadi
•
Ezzat, Tony
•
Poggio, Tomaso
Date Issued
February 28, 2003
Series/Report no.
AIM-2003-003
CBCL-224
Abstract
abstract With many visual speech animation techniques now available, there is a clear need for systematic perceptual evaluation schemes. We describe here our scheme and its application to a new video-realistic (potentially indistinguishable from real recorded video) visual-speech animation system, called Mary 101. Two types of experiments were performed: a) distinguishing visually between real and synthetic image- sequences of the same utterances, ("Turing tests") and b) gauging visual speech recognition by comparing lip-reading performance of the real and synthetic image-sequences of the same utterances ("Intelligibility tests"). Subjects that were presented randomly with either real or synthetic image-sequences could not tell the synthetic from the real sequences above chance level. The same subjects when asked to lip-read the utterances from the same image-sequences recognized speech from real image-sequences significantly better than from synthetic ones. However, performance for both, real and synthetic, were at levels suggested in the literature on lip-reading. We conclude from the two experiments that the animation of Mary 101 is adequate for providing a percept of a talking head. However, additional effort is required to improve the animation for lip-reading purposes like rehabilitation and language learning. In addition, these two tasks could be considered as explicit and implicit perceptual discrimination tasks. In the explicit task (a), each stimulus is classified directly as a synthetic or real image-sequence by detecting a possible difference between the synthetic and the real image-sequences. The implicit perceptual discrimination task (b) consists of a comparison between visual recognition of speech of real and synthetic image-sequences. Our results suggest that implicit perceptual discrimination is a more sensitive method for discrimination between synthetic and real image-sequences than explicit perceptual discrimination.
Subjects
AI
visual speech
speech animation
face animation
image morphing
lip reading
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7275
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.