Disease and Development: A Reply to Bloom, Canning, and Fink
Name
Disease and Development - A Reply to Bloom, Cannin-2.pdf
Size
106.22 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
a358a3b3d1ec835092d042557e5c219f
Author(s)
Acemoglu, Daron
Johnson, Simon
Date Issued
December 2014
Journal
Journal of Political Economy
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Citation
Acemoglu, Daron, and Simon Johnson. “Disease and Development: A Reply to Bloom, Canning, and Fink.” Journal of Political Economy 122, no. 6 (December 2014): 1367–1375. © 2014 The University of Chicago
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Beginning in the 1940s, a wave of health innovations and more effective international public health measures led to a rapid and large improvement in health; for example, in some relatively poor countries, life expectancy at birth quickly rose from around 40 years to over 60 years. In Acemoglu and Johnson (2006, 2007), we constructed an instrument for these changes in life expectancy: “predicted mortality,” which is calculated from initial mortality by disease and the timing of global disease interventions. Across a wide range of specifications, our work suggests no positive effects—over 40- or 60-year horizons—of life expectancy on GDP per capita (or GDP per working-age population).
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1086/677190
