Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Homophily and the Speed of Social Mobilization: The Effect of Acquired and Ascribed Traits

Homophily and the Speed of Social Mobilization: The Effect of Acquired and Ascribed Traits

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Alstott-2014-Homophily and the sp.pdf

Size

633.34 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

15d1929241e6820b1f74eb1d5d4e756d

Author(s)
Alstott, Jeff
•
Madnick, Stuart E.
•
Velu, Chander
Date Issued
April 2014
Journal
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Citation
Alstott, Jeff, Stuart Madnick, and Chander Velu. “Homophily and the Speed of Social Mobilization: The Effect of Acquired and Ascribed Traits.” Edited by Angel Sánchez. PLoS ONE 9, no. 4 (April 16, 2014): e95140.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Large-scale mobilization of individuals across social networks is becoming increasingly prevalent in society. However, little is known about what affects the speed of social mobilization. Here we use a framed field experiment to identify and measure properties of individuals and their relationships that predict mobilization speed. We ran a global social mobilization contest and recorded personal traits of the participants and those they recruited. We studied the effects of ascribed traits (gender, age) and acquired traits (geography, and information source) on the speed of mobilization. We found that homophily, a preference for interacting with other individuals with similar traits, had a mixed role in social mobilization. Homophily was present for acquired traits, in which mobilization speed was faster when the recuiter and recruit had the same trait compared to different traits. In contrast, we did not find support for homophily for the ascribed traits. Instead, those traits had other, non-homophily effects: Females mobilized other females faster than males mobilized other males. Younger recruiters mobilized others faster, and older recruits mobilized slower. Recruits also mobilized faster when they first heard about the contest directly from the contest organization, and decreased in speed when hearing from less personal source types (e.g. family vs. media). These findings show that social mobilization includes dynamics that are unlike other, more passive forms of social activity propagation. These findings suggest relevant factors for engineering social mobilization tasks for increased speed.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88045
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095140
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.