Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Emulating Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning for Jaw Cysts with Machine Learning

Emulating Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning for Jaw Cysts with Machine Learning

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

diagnostics-12-01968-v3.pdf

Size

6.78 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

3c5979db4fdfce48c08286e308773bf0

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
packager-63075a55.zip (5.65 MB)
Author(s)
Feher, Balazs
•
Kuchler, Ulrike
•
Schwendicke, Falk
•
Schneider, Lisa
•
Cejudo Grano de Oro, Jose Eduardo
•
Xi, Tong
•
Vinayahalingam, Shankeeth
•
Hsu, Tzu-Ming Harry
•
Brinz, Janet
•
Chaurasia, Akhilanand
more
Date Issued
August 14, 2022
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citation
Diagnostics 12 (8): 1968 (2022)
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The detection and classification of cystic lesions of the jaw is of high clinical relevance and represents a topic of interest in medical artificial intelligence research. The human clinical diagnostic reasoning process uses contextual information, including the spatial relation of the detected lesion to other anatomical structures, to establish a preliminary classification. Here, we aimed to emulate clinical diagnostic reasoning step by step by using a combined object detection and image segmentation approach on panoramic radiographs (OPGs). We used a multicenter training dataset of 855 OPGs (all positives) and an evaluation set of 384 OPGs (240 negatives). We further compared our models to an international human control group of ten dental professionals from seven countries. The object detection model achieved an average precision of 0.42 (intersection over union (IoU): 0.50, maximal detections: 100) and an average recall of 0.394 (IoU: 0.50–0.95, maximal detections: 100). The classification model achieved a sensitivity of 0.84 for odontogenic cysts and 0.56 for non-odontogenic cysts as well as a specificity of 0.59 for odontogenic cysts and 0.84 for non-odontogenic cysts (IoU: 0.30). The human control group achieved a sensitivity of 0.70 for odontogenic cysts, 0.44 for non-odontogenic cysts, and 0.56 for OPGs without cysts as well as a specificity of 0.62 for odontogenic cysts, 0.95 for non-odontogenic cysts, and 0.76 for OPGs without cysts. Taken together, our results show that a combined object detection and image segmentation approach is feasible in emulating the human clinical diagnostic reasoning process in classifying cystic lesions of the jaw.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/144430
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081968
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.